Jan 6, 2025 | 9 min read
Top Line Summary
Historical Performance: A 100% stock portfolio offers higher long-term growth but comes with significant volatility and short-term risks.
Investor Suitability: Best suited for aggressive investors with high risk tolerance, long time horizons, and comfort with volatility.
Consider Risks: Volatility, sequence of returns risk, and emotional challenges during downturns make this strategy unsuitable for all.
Should Your Retirement Plan Include 100% Stocks?
The idea of a retirement portfolio composed entirely of stocks might seem audacious. After all, conventional wisdom emphasizes diversification and a gradual shift towards bonds as retirement approaches. However, recent research and long-term market trends suggest that a 100% stock allocation may be a viable option for certain investors. This article delves into the implications of such a strategy, exploring its potential benefits and drawbacks, and ultimately, whether it's suitable for your retirement plan.
Historical Performance and Potential Benefits
Historically, stocks have outperformed bonds over the long run¹. This superior performance is a primary argument for a 100% stock portfolio. For example, one study found that over a 37-year period, a 100% equity allocation using the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index (VTSMX) returned 10.62%, while a portfolio with 60% VTSMX and 40% Vanguard Total Bond Market Index (VBMFX) returned 8.74%².
A study by Cederburg, Anarkulova, and O'Doherty, which used a million simulations and compared various portfolio allocations (100% government bonds, 60% stocks/40% bonds, 100% stocks with a gradual shift to bonds, 100% domestic stocks, and 50% domestic/50% international stocks), suggests that an all-stock portfolio generally yields higher returns, even for retirees³. Their research found that a 100% stock portfolio, specifically with one-third allocated to U.S. stocks and two-thirds to international stocks, generated approximately 30% more wealth at retirement compared to a traditional stock and bond mix⁴. Furthermore, to accumulate the same wealth, investors with a balanced portfolio would need to save 40% more than those with an all-equity portfolio⁶.
It's important to note that while diversification through a mix of stocks and bonds is a common approach, the Cederburg et al. study challenges this conventional wisdom, suggesting that diversification within an all-stock portfolio, particularly through international stocks, might be more effective¹.
Risk Tolerance and Investor Suitability
Before considering a 100% stock portfolio, it's crucial to understand the concept of risk tolerance and how it applies to different investor profiles. Risk tolerance refers to the amount of potential investment loss an investor is willing to accept⁸. It's influenced by factors such as an individual's financial situation, investment goals, and comfort level with market fluctuations⁸.
Investors are often categorized into three main types based on their risk tolerance:
Investor Profile | Risk Tolerance | Suitable Portfolio Allocation |
Conservative | Low | Primarily fixed-income investments (e.g., bonds) with a small allocation to stocks |
Moderate | Medium | A balanced mix of stocks and bonds |
Aggressive | High | Higher allocation to stocks, potentially including a 100% stock portfolio |
While the potential for higher returns with a 100% stock portfolio is enticing, it comes with increased risk and volatility. Stocks are inherently more volatile than bonds⁹. This means that a portfolio composed entirely of stocks can experience significant fluctuations, especially during market downturns¹. Investors must carefully assess their risk tolerance before adopting this strategy⁹.
Aggressive investors with a high risk tolerance and a long-term investment horizon might find a 100% stock portfolio suitable⁸. They are comfortable with market fluctuations and prioritize maximizing returns over minimizing short-term losses. However, it's important to remember that even aggressive investors should con⁸sider diversification within their stock portfolio to manage risk effectively⁷.
Moderate investors may prefer a balanced approach, incorporating some bonds to mitigate risk while still participating in equity market growth¹⁰.
Conservative investors with a low risk tolerance are unlikely to be comfortable with a 100% stock portfolio¹⁰. They prioritize capital preservation and prefer the stability of bonds or other fixed-income investments¹⁰.
Furthermore, it's crucial to recognize that investors generally exhibit risk aversion, meaning they tend to feel the pain of losses more strongly than the pleasure of gains². This psychological factor can make it challenging to stay the course with a 100% stock portfolio during periods of market volatility¹¹. Selling stocks during a downturn due to fear or panic can lock in losses and derail long-term investment goals¹¹.
Factors to Consider
Beyond risk tolerance, several other factors influence the suitability of a 100% stock retirement plan:
Age: Younger investors generally have a higher risk tolerance and a longer time horizon, making them better suited for an all-stock portfolio¹². As investors age, their risk tolerance typically decreases, and they may consider gradually reducing their equity exposure¹³. However, with increasing life expectancy, the traditional "100 minus your age" rule for determining stock allocation might need adjustments¹⁴. People are living longer, and their retirement portfolios may need to last for 30 years or more. This extended time horizon could support a higher equity allocation even for older investors.
Time Horizon: A longer time horizon is a significant advantage for investors considering a 100% stock portfolio¹⁵. It allows them to recover from potential market downturns and benefit from the long-term growth potential of equities¹⁵. Research suggests that while a 100% stock portfolio might experience higher volatility in the short term, its performance becomes increasingly dominant over longer periods (10-20 years)¹⁶. For shorter time horizons, a more conservative approach with a lower stock allocation may be appropriate¹⁷.
Financial Goals: If your retirement goals require a high level of capital preservation or a steady income stream, a 100% stock portfolio might not be the best option9. Diversification with bonds or other income-generating assets can provide more stability¹⁸.
Potential Drawbacks
Despite its potential benefits, a 100% stock portfolio has some drawbacks:
Volatility: As mentioned earlier, stocks are inherently more volatile than bonds⁹. A 100% stock portfolio can experience significant fluctuations, especially during market downturns¹. This volatility can be emotionally challenging for investors and may lead to poor investment decisions, such as selling low during a panic¹⁹. Moreover, a 100% stock portfolio can result in significantly larger drawdowns compared to a more balanced portfolio, potentially jeopardizing long-term financial security². For example, one study found that a 100% equity portfolio had a worst-case drawdown of -51% compared to -31% for a 60/40 portfolio².
Inflation and Deflation: A 100% stock portfolio offers limited protection against inflation and deflation¹. While stocks generally offer a hedge against inflation over the long term, they can be vulnerable to periods of high inflation or deflationary spirals¹.
Sequence of Returns Risk: The order in which investment returns occur can significantly impact retirement outcomes, especially when taking distributions. A series of negative returns early in retirement can severely deplete a portfolio, even if followed by strong returns later on⁹. For instance, imagine two retirees with identical portfolios starting with $5 million. Retiree A experiences negative returns in the first few years of retirement, while Retiree B experiences positive returns. Even if both achieve the same average annual return over 20 years, Retiree A could end up with significantly less due to the unfavorable sequence of returns⁹.
Lost Decade: Investing solely in stocks increases the chance of experiencing a "lost decade," where the portfolio fails to generate significant returns or even experiences losses over a prolonged period¹⁹. This can be particularly detrimental during retirement when consistent growth is essential to sustain withdrawals.
Alternative Investment Strategies
Investors seeking alternatives to a 100% stock portfolio can consider:
Balanced Portfolios: A mix of stocks and bonds can provide a balance between growth potential and risk mitigation²⁰. The classic 60/40 portfolio (60% stocks, 40% bonds) is a popular option4.
Target-Date Funds: These funds automatically adjust the asset allocation based on the investor's target retirement date, gradually shifting from stocks to bonds as retirement approaches¹.
Alternative Investments: Real estate, precious metals, and commodities can offer diversification benefits and potential hedges against inflation²¹. However, these investments often come with their own set of risks and complexities²².
The Bottom Line
A 100% stock retirement plan can be a viable option for investors with a high risk tolerance, a long time horizon, and the ability to withstand market volatility. However, it's not a one-size-fits-all solution. Factors such as age, financial goals, and individual circumstances play a crucial role in determining the appropriate asset allocation.
Retirement planning is not a static process. It requires ongoing evaluation and adjustments based on evolving personal circumstances, market conditions, and even societal trends like increasing life expectancy. While a 100% stock portfolio might align with certain investor profiles, it's essential to remember that diversification, even within an all-equity approach, remains crucial for managing risk. Ultimately, seeking personalized advice from a qualified financial advisor is paramount to developing a retirement plan that effectively balances risk and return while meeting individual needs and goals.
At Israilov Financial, we specialize in turning retirement dreams into reality. Our experienced team will help you navigate every aspect of retirement planning, from investment strategies to tax optimization. Schedule your free discovery meeting today and let's map out your path to financial independence.
REFERENCES:
1. Should You Invest Your Entire Portfolio In Stocks? - Investopedia, accessed January 3, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/stocks/07/100_equities.asp
2. Should Long-Term Investors Be 100% in Equities? - Morningstar, accessed January 3, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/should-long-term-investors-be-100-equities
3. Is 100% stocks really the best option for your portfolio - Capital Topics, accessed January 3, 2025, https://www.capitaltopics.com/blogue/is-100-stocks-really-the-best-option-for-your-portfolio
4. Should you be 100% invested in equities? - Timeline, accessed January 3, 2025, https://www.timeline.co/blog/should-you-be-100-invested-in-equities
5. 100% stocks for retirement? A new study says dump the 60/40 portfolio and target-date funds. | Morningstar, accessed January 3, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/2024123118/100-stocks-for-retirement-a-new-study-says-dump-the-6040-portfolio-and-target-date-funds
6. Historical Rate of Return for Equity and Bond Portfolios - Boldin Help Center, accessed January 3, 2025, https://help.boldin.com/en/articles/8430287-historical-rate-of-return-for-equity-and-bond-portfolios
7. 100% stocks: historical performance from 1994 to 2024 - Curvo, accessed January 3, 2025, https://curvo.eu/backtest/en/portfolio/100-stocks--NoIgjADBCkAEDOAXA9gYwNbxAGmKAkgKJQBCALADICsAmgJwAcAzDhAHQMMC6uIRpAaQCyZAOIAtAGyTWbMACYuSoA
8. Risk Tolerance - Overview, Factors, and Types of Tolerance - Corporate Finance Institute, accessed January 3, 2025, https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/wealth-management/risk-tolerance/
9. 100% Stock Portfolio: Sound Strategy or Click Bait? - Plancorp, accessed January 3, 2025, https://www.plancorp.com/blog/100-stock-portfolio
10. Your investor profile: Investing according to risk tolerance - iA Groupe financier, accessed January 3, 2025, https://ia.ca/advice-zone/finances/investor-profiles-why-it-s-important-to-know-your-risk-tolerance
11. 7 Reasons Not to Use a 100% Stock Portfolio - The White Coat Investor, accessed January 3, 2025, https://www.whitecoatinvestor.com/100-stock-portfolio/
12. Asset Allocation by Age: 20s and 30s, 40s and 50s, 60s - SoFi, accessed January 3, 2025, https://www.sofi.com/learn/content/asset-allocation-by-age/
13. Should Retirees Follow the '100 Minus Your Age' Rule? - SmartAsset, accessed January 3, 2025, https://smartasset.com/retirement/rule-of-100-investing
14. Stock Allocation Rules - Investopedia, accessed January 3, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/062714/100-minus-your-age-outdated.asp
15. How to invest based on your time horizon - InvestEngine Insights, accessed January 3, 2025, https://blog.investengine.com/how-to-invest-based-on-your-time-horizon/
16. How Time Horizon Affects the Odds of Equity Investing - Morningstar, accessed January 3, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com/columns/rekenthaler-report/how-time-horizon-affects-odds-equity-investing
17. 2 Examples Why Time Horizon & Risk Aversion Matter Most In Investment Success, accessed January 3, 2025, https://www.bankeronwheels.com/risk-aversion-time-horizon-investing/
18. 100% stocks for retirement? A new study says dump the 60/40 portfolio and target-date funds. | Morningstar, accessed January 3, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/20250102179/100-stocks-for-retirement-a-new-study-says-dump-the-6040-portfolio-and-target-date-funds
19. Should your retirement portfolio contain 100% shares? - Pyrford Financial Planning, accessed January 3, 2025, https://www.pyrfordfp.com/post/should-your-retirement-portfolio-contain-100-percent-shares
20. What Is the Ideal Number of Stocks to Have in a Portfolio? - Investopedia, accessed January 3, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/05/optimalportfoliosize.asp
21. Beyond The 401(K): Exploring Alternative Retirement Plans - Mutual of Omaha, accessed January 3, 2025, https://www.mutualofomaha.com/advice/retirement-planning/navigating-your-retirement/beyond-the-401k-exploring-alternative-retirement-plans
22. How to Build Retirement Wealth With Alternative Investing - Mainstar Trust, accessed January 3, 2025, https://mainstartrust.com/blog/post/building-retirement-wealth-through-alternative-investing
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS
Past performance is no guarantee of future returns
The graphs and charts in this commentary are for illustrative purposes only and not indicative of any actual investment. Index returns do not reflect any fees, expenses, or sales charges. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Stocks are not guaranteed and have been more volatile than other asset classes. Historical returns were the result of certain market factors and events which may not be repeated in the future. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgement in determining whether investments are appropriate for clients.
This material is intended for information purposes only, and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation or an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any securities.
Disclaimer: Investments are not guaranteed and are subject to investment risk, including possible loss of the principal amount invested. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. All allocations and opinions expressed are as of the date of this presentation and subject to change. The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice or a solicitation. Information obtained from 3rd parties is believed to be accurate, but has not been independently verified.
The opinions expressed in this article are for general informational purposes only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual or on any specific security. The material is presented solely for information purposes and has been gathered from sources believed to be reliable, however Israilov Financial LLC cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information, and certain information presented here may have been condensed or summarized from its original source. Israilov Financial LLC does not provide tax or legal advice, and nothing contained in these materials should be taken as such.
As always, please remember investing involves risk and possible loss of principal capital. Advisory services are only offered to clients or prospective clients where Israilov Financial LLC and its representatives are properly licensed or exempt from licensure. No advice may be rendered by Israilov Financial LLC unless a client service agreement is in place.
Comments